Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Handheld RFID Reader Claiming 25-Foot Read Range, 400 Tags/Sec. Read Rate
advertisement
advertisement

Handheld RFID Reader Claiming 25-Foot Read Range, 400 Tags/Sec. Read Rate

Written by Evan Schuman
October 28th, 2008
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

A Hong Kong RFID vendor is boasting about a new $1,950-$2,500 handheld UHF reader “with a read range exceeding 25 feet with standard dipole passive tags and a throughput reaching 400 tags per second.” That claim is usually reserved for fixed readers, a very sharp claimed performance boost.

Convergence Systems Limited has dubbed it the CS101, and it eked out an endorsement from the normally publicity-shy folk at Boeing. Boeing Research Engineer Steve Villa praised Geiger counter mode. “In this mode, the reader’s ability to singulate and locate tags, even in a highly reflective environment, is excellent.”


advertisement

2 Comments | Read Handheld RFID Reader Claiming 25-Foot Read Range, 400 Tags/Sec. Read Rate

  1. Allison Says:

    What prevents a hacker from buying and reading RFID credit cards from further away?

  2. A Reader Says:

    The difference between RFID credit cards and these RFID tags is in the frequency of the two systems and the physics of radio wave propagation at those different frequencies.

    RFID tags are available in several frequencies. The ones read by the equipment in this article are based on UHF. Hackers have already demonstrated homebrew equipment that can read UHF RFID tags from 69 feet.

    Most credit cards are based on ISO-14443, which uses a much longer wavelength than UHF tags and typically claims a maximum read distance of a few inches. Hackers have demonstrated low-cost reading equipment with a range of about a foot.

    The gear in this article is newsworthy for its impressive read-rate performance at these distances, and not just for its long distance reach. Something like this could work well covering an entire loading dock, for example.

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...