Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Google Pushes 2D Barcodes With Mass Mailing Of Storefront Stickers
advertisement
advertisement

Google Pushes 2D Barcodes With Mass Mailing Of Storefront Stickers

Written by Fred J. Aun
December 9th, 2009
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

It’s been almost two years since Sears become the first U.S. retailer to embrace 2D barcodes, a move that launched a tidal wave of, well, pretty much nothing. This week, Google said it was trying to breathe life into these barcodes by mailing 200,000 2D barcode stickers to small businesses throughout the country. Such a move could allow these mom-and-pops to offer in-depth marketing information to anyone at the click of a smartphone.

The Google initiative, first reported by Techcrunch, is proactive and therefore feels much more powerful than Microsoft’s efforts to market its “Tag” code idea. And Google is sweetening the potential adoption-rate odds by giving away 40,000 Quickmark 2D barcode reader apps for the iPhone. Just like contactless, which is also suffering from a heart-pounding string of apathy, 2D needs three things to happen in parallel if it is to succeed: A huge number of places that are showcasing 2D barcodes; a very strong percentage of consumers carrying phones that can easily read 2D barcodes; and plenty of publicized incentives to get those consumers to use the 2D barcodes from those retailers. The phones are well on their way, and Google’s initiative seems like a good faith effort to jumpstart the other two points.


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...