Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » How Easily Should Social Networks Reveal Friends To E-Commerce Sites?
advertisement
advertisement

How Easily Should Social Networks Reveal Friends To E-Commerce Sites?

Written by Evan Schuman
September 15th, 2009
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

The foundation of the intersection of social networks and E-Commerce is that consumers will be much more likely to trust and buy from a retailer if they know that their friends are already buying from that chain. The Catch-22 of such an approach is that it’s difficult to get a consumer to name friends without some huge immediate benefit to that consumer. And, no, the unearthing of friends who already shop at an E-Commerce site is seen as a benefit to the retailer, not to the consumer.

One approach that has been tried is leveraging services such as Facebook Connect, which lets a user log onto Facebook and then log onto an E-Commerce site (using the same browser) and allow that site to access Facebook names—with the customer’s permission—without the customer revealing a Facebook password to the E-Commerce site. But then it runs into the limit of the system’s inability to display a friend’s shopping pattern without that friend’s permission. (“Hi, Brenda! I see that you’re shopping at Phil’s Pervert Video House, too.”)

One vendor, TurnTo Networks, has rolled out a tweak that might help a little. If consumers connect an E-Commerce site with their list of friends—either by typing them in or by connecting the merchant site with existing lists from Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn or other social sites—it will give a heads-up that one friend has already used that site. It won’t say who it is, but it will ask that friend’s permission to be revealed.

The idea is a good one, but tiptoeing into this neighborhood is dangerous. What if the customer, for example, has only one or two friends listed? Wouldn’t this notification of “one of your friends has shopped here” be a privacy violation?

But there’s also the fundamental issue of how much people will use such a service. It’s easy to see how many GenY consumers will want to shop where their friends shop. But wouldn’t they be more likely to simply pose that question to their friends directly?

Another small hurdle: TurnTo’s existing merchants tend to be on the very small side—mostly niche merchants. That’s fine, though, because many of E-Commerce’s greatest treasures are found in relatively obscure sites. But what are the odds that someone’s friends will have already shopped there? Isn’t there a bad flip side to this if consumers are routinely being told “Nope. None of your friends shop here”? Most merchants would rather the system stay silent unless a friend is discovered to have shopped there.

A nice touch that TurnTo has added is that the social network integration can be done once, but used repeatedly. “Once it’s done, it’s done for any merchant that uses TurnTo,” said TurnTo CEO George Eberstadt, which lists about 24 merchants as participating. “If a friend-match is found and the friend has agreed to serve as a reference for the merchant, we show the shopper the friend’s name.”

Eberstadt argues that this approach can also be used to encourage return visits from existing customers. “The on-behalf-of-shopper E-mail is a powerful, friendly way to bring past-customers back to the site. For example: imagine you’re into your truck and you recently bought snazzy hubcaps at Stylintrucks,” he said. “You get a message from them to the effect that, ‘Your friend (insert name) is shopping here and has a question. Mind helping her out?’ with a link back to the site to take action.”

The integration of social networks and E-Commerce is essential, and it will happen. But there will be a lot of slips and falls en route. What TurnTo has done may not be perfect; early pioneer moves rarely are. It’s now up to E-Commerce giants to try crafting their own ideas.


advertisement

One Comment | Read How Easily Should Social Networks Reveal Friends To E-Commerce Sites?

  1. George Eberstadt Says:

    A few points of clarification:

    “What if the customer, for example, has only one or two friends listed? Wouldn’t this notification of “one of your friends has shopped here” be a privacy violation?”

    => The system requires that the shopper have at least 50 friends before showing a count of matches. (That limit doesn’t apply to friends who have opted in to having their names shown, of course.)

    “Wouldn’t they be more likely to simply pose that question to their friends directly?”

    => Many people are hesitant to blast all their friends with “Hey, anyone know about X?” messages. People are much more likely to seek advice when they know who to ask. And sometimes, there’s no need to ask – just knowing that friends also shop at the same store is enough.

    “Most merchants would rather the system stay silent unless a friend is discovered to have shopped there.”

    => If there is no first-degree friend match, TurnTo shows other things like friends-of-friends, neighbors (based on zip code), popular items, and highly recommended items. So the system can still be helpful to the shopper while also giving the feeling of a crowded, buzzing store.

    George Eberstadt
    Founder and CEO
    TurnTo

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...