Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » If The iPhone Embraces NFC, Will It Be Too Late To Make A Difference?
advertisement
advertisement

If The iPhone Embraces NFC, Will It Be Too Late To Make A Difference?

Written by Evan Schuman
November 12th, 2009
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

For years, retail efforts with NFC phones have been far from smashing successes. The technology has limped along from trial to trial, the quintessential answer in search of a problem. The latest rumors out of Cupertino suggest that the next-generation iPhone will ship with NFC pre-installed. If true, will this make a difference to the technology’s acceptance, or is it already too late?

A couple of years ago, Near Field Communication was seen in some influential corners—such as at consumer goods giant Procter & Gamble—as the ultimate victor in the fight between NFC and 2D barcodes. Many saw NFC as the better technology, with 2D barcodes being used as a placeholder until NFC was ready. But in the last couple of years, neither technology has gotten very far in the U.S. Few phone manufacturers included the feature, and even fewer developers tried to design for it.

According to figures from Juniper Research—one of the few remaining analyst firms that even bother to track NFC efforts closely—the NFC market will bring in about $110 billion in sales by 2014, when “one in every six mobile subscribers globally will have an NFC-enabled device.” But that’s certainly not the outlook for the U.S., Juniper said on Monday (Nov. 9). “Currently, adoption is centered in the Far East, with use very limited outside of this region.”

The wildcard here is Apple. The iPhone buzz seems to have a way of reviving technologies that are powerful but haven’t yet connected meaningfully with consumers (such as mobile barcode scanning). If it ships, will Apple consumers use NFC? Forget whether they will or won’t, for the moment. The better question is “Will ISVs think that they will? Will retailers?” For NFC to work, the apps on the mobile devices must be user-friendly and compelling. But that won’t help unless enough retailers and consumer goods manufacturers and others start using NFC to market products and services.

Unless NFC wants to suffer the fate of the underwhelming contactless payment space—Oh, I forgot. It already has—the information-rich uses for NFC must deploy before the phones ship. That gets us into a fascinating decision question. Will the iPhone pre-buzz make those communities (retailers, CG players, ISVs) believe that the market will be huge? If so, they’ll develop for it. That, in turn, will whet the appetites of consumers who will then receive their new iPhones and discover NFC capabilities already there.

That’s why figuring out how many iPhone users will access NFC is irrelevant. As far as the industry is concerned, it’s all about expectations. When it’s an issue of deploying on time or controlling its partners (how are you iPhoners enjoying that AT&T end-of-summer promised tethering?), Apple comes up short. But when it’s an issue of pre-hyping and creating drama where none has any right to exist? Apple’s the master. If it does choose to bundle, Near Field Communication may be more near than ever.


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...