Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » KMart.com Shut Down For “Site Enhancements”
advertisement
advertisement

KMart.com Shut Down For “Site Enhancements”

Written by Evan Schuman
March 19th, 2009
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

KMart.com went down a few minutes after midnight (New York time) on Thursday (March 19) morning and stayed down for at least several hours. Pingdom first detected the outage but it wasn’t hard to confirm. Initially the site was simply not responsive. After a little more than two hours, the homepage was replaced with a sign that said, “We’re sorry. Kmart.com is temporarily closed for site enhancements.” Is it coincidental that this comes on the heels of Sears declaring this week that it was going to be expanding more of its online efforts with its KMart corporate brother?

The early morning timing of the outage could suggest some site maintenance, but the fact that the site went silent for hours and that it was only then that such a “Move along. Nothing to see here today, folk” sign was posted, that does make it look a little baffling. (Note: The site seems to have come back now, several hours after the darkness. That’s certainly good, but the question of why it went dark for hours before a maintenance note was posted still exists. Sears just messaged that the outage was for a planned site upgrade and that they had thought the splash page had been there since it went down. It might have been somewhere, but we didn’t see it.)


advertisement

One Comment | Read KMart.com Shut Down For “Site Enhancements”

  1. TJ Says:

    Check it out now. Kmart.com was down for a planned site redesign.

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...