Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Mobile Barcode Scans: Pushed By E-Commerce, But Only Helping In-Store?
advertisement
advertisement

Mobile Barcode Scans: Pushed By E-Commerce, But Only Helping In-Store?

Written by Evan Schuman
November 4th, 2009
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

E-Commerce sites have been pushing a series of mobile applets that can scan barcodes in-store. The idea is that consumers standing in a Target can scan the barcode of an item they’re interested in purchasing and instantly see a list of online sites offering that item, along with its respective prices.

In theory, this will reveal if that retailer is charging way too much. It’s an option that E-tailers love; they see themselves making lots of sales off of greedy physical stores, especially because the sites typically have lower overhead expenses and, as a result, can sometimes charge a lot less.

But that’s the opposite of what seems to be happening. The mobile barcode scan (the iPhone’s RedLaser app is one of the better options) is apparently helping in-store sales, to the extent that it’s having any effect at all. Consumers simply find the scans comforting, which makes them more likely to buy the item in-store because the online prices are not usually that much less than the in-store price.

Given that the consumer is already standing in that Target holding the desired item, there needs to be a rather substantial price differential to justify leaving the store and waiting for snailmail to deliver the item days from now. In short, the mobile barcode scans are a great idea for brick-and-mortars but are probably a weaker investment for online-only merchants.

The trick for E-Commerce sites is to get those scans to happen outside the store, at some place where an E-Commerce purchase is easier for consumers to make. It could still work wonders for out-of-stock situations, except that there would likely be no barcodes to scan if there’s no inventory left. (Sure, the consumer could type the name of the product into a browser, but where’s the high-tech fun in that? At least use the voice-recognition power of Google’s iPhone app to generate a little geeky self-respect.)

If these barcode apps become popular, we wonder how some chains with price-match guarantees will deal with the situation? Will a BlackBerry screen filled with online pricing that’s between 10 percent and 40 percent lower qualify?


advertisement

2 Comments | Read Mobile Barcode Scans: Pushed By E-Commerce, But Only Helping In-Store?

  1. James Loar Says:

    From the article:

    “The trick for E-Commerce sites is to get those scans to happen outside the store, at some place where an E-Commerce purchase is easier for consumers to make.”

    This would be the idea behind putting a barcode on an advertisement so that a person could scan the ad from the newspaper (or code on an on-line ad pop-up?), to find the best price. But the advertiser is wanting the person to buy from them. But I think it will be the voice-recognition app that makes this work – rather than a scan engine.

  2. Just A Reader Says:

    “The trick for E-Commerce sites is to get those scans to happen outside the store…….” Do you think we need the bar-code reader then?? One can simply type the product name and search for it in different locations.

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...