Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Most Retail Sites Shrug Off Cyber Monday Deluge
advertisement
advertisement

Most Retail Sites Shrug Off Cyber Monday Deluge

Written by Fred J. Aun
December 1st, 2009
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Cyber Monday came and went with a conspicuous absence of problems at major retailer Web sites. It’s a fact that could mean E-Commerce teams did a good job preparing for the expected onslaught or that the blow was softened because many merchants began running sales earlier in November. That said, the day (Nov. 30) wasn’t error-free. There were some sporadic periods of downtime at Kohls.com, a site that also had problems early on Black Friday.

CVS.com suffered a brief period of slow responsiveness, while Home Depot had a half-hour period of downtime beginning at about 4 A.M. (New York time). VitaminShoppe.com failed to properly process E-mailed discount coupons, and much of Americangirl.com presented visitors with a site-down message during the day.

Dotcom-Monitor noticed a glitch at Bloomingdales’ site during the day. At one point, Bloomingdales.com displayed a message that said something to the effect of ‘Please Stay With Us,’ while the homepage took a long time to load, said Brad Canham, vice president of business development at Dotcom-Monitor. “Their standard response time is less than a half-second, but they did have one thing happen there,” he said.

AlertBot saw minor problems at Kohl’s. “The downtime periods haven’t been that long, but their Web site is still running very slow and timing out from time-to-time,” said Justin Noll, sales and marketing director at AlertBot.

CVS.com suffered problems “relating to its server performance,” said Gareth Evans of U.K.-based monitoring company Sitemorse, which noted that the page response problems started at about 11:45 A.M. New York time. CVS’ “servers were averaging nearly 2 seconds to respond to simple requests for content such as images,” Evans said. “We saw one of the links to one of their pages take longer than 60 seconds to respond,” a situation that worsened to the point where the servers were averaging more than 3 seconds to respond. It soon improved “to a slow, but not terrible, 0.8 of a second.”

Evans said it must be remembered that the response figures “are the average for the requests for each of the elements of the page,” including the HTML, each .gif and .jpg image, and the JavaScript. He said the site was working normally shortly after noon. “This probably relates to heavy load on their Web site,” Evans said. “It didn’t fail, but it creaked for 10 to 15 minutes.”

The VitaminShoppe glitch was a case of digital couponing gone bad. The vitamin chain E-mailed customers 10-percent-off coupons, all set to expire at the end of Monday, but the coupons didn’t work. The coupons “did not process correctly during checkout” and it was “due to a technical error,” the retailer said in an E-mail blast to coupon recipients. The apology E-mail noted that the company was extending the sale to the end of Tuesday (Dec. 1).

AmericanGirl.com had a series of “sorry, site problems” pages up throughout Cyber Monday. The site’s homepage worked fine, but attempts to dig deeper or to buy anything proved fruitless. “To improve your online experience, we’re updating our site,” said the site when shoppers attempted to view items. “This requires the Web site to be temporarily unavailable. We apologize for the inconvenience. Check back soon to enjoy the changes we’ve made.”


advertisement

One Comment | Read Most Retail Sites Shrug Off Cyber Monday Deluge

  1. Web Guy Says:

    I think Mr. Canham is trying to drum up business. No one else reported ANY problems with bloomingdales.com.

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...