Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Radio Shack Tries Rebates That Focus On What The Customer Did Not Purchase
advertisement
advertisement

Radio Shack Tries Rebates That Focus On What The Customer Did Not Purchase

Written by Fred J. Aun
June 24th, 2009
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Radio Shack is launching a rebate experiment at the end of next month (July 27) that focuses on what the chain believes the consumers opted to not buy.

Consumers will go to the chain’ site and use codes from their POS receipts to begin the process.

“We have the demographic information and we’ve got the fact they bought, say, a cellphone and, more importantly, what we have is what they didn’t buy, such as a warranty or accessories,” said Chris Quinlan, the CEO of a vendor called Ohana that is working with Radio Shack on the trial.

“During the process of validating that rebate online, we give them the opportunity to spend that money directly at Radioshack.com for a bonus or for specific products that have a higher probability they are going to purchase. It’s not just arbitrary,” he said. “The retailer and rebate sponsor, in this case the cellphone company or Radio Shack, also benefit. That rebate amount is spent back on a specific rebate sponsor or at the retailer. We’re vastly eliminating the escheat issue because the money is being spent.”

Ohana receives the POS information from Radio Shack and validates that the purchase requirements for the rebate offer are met. “We then interrogate the data to take into consideration the demographic information, such as name, address, where you live, age, purchase information and what you didn’t buy like a warranty or case,” Quinlan said. “We put all that information through our system. The response to the consumer is an offer that has a high probability of being acted on because it is specifically targeted to that consumer.”

With the new Radio Shack system, customers are not forced to buy something from Radio Shack. They can also get their refunds in the form of an “open-loop” MasterCard that can be used anywhere or as a Radio Shack gift card.

He said no secure personal information is shared with Ohana. “All that information is owned by the rebate sponsor,” Quinlan said. “It’s Radio Shack’s information. We have marketing programs we work on with Radio Shack regarding the harvesting of e-mail, but it’s completely the property of Radio Shack.” Quinlan said the system requires no changes to Radio Shack’s POS system.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Radio Shack Tries Rebates That Focus On What The Customer Did Not Purchase

  1. Mark Price Says:

    What a fascinating way to monetize rebates! The challenge was, and will be, to get consumers to go to the web, to the RS website, and actually go thru the process. Traditionally, less than 1% ever mail in their rebates; web response rates may be higher, depending on the amount of verification necessary.

    The personalization of offers addresses one key need that loyal customers have — recognition. To succeed, this system must be integrated, tho, into the total customer experience seamlessly.

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...