Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Sears’ MyGofer Prototype Gets Mixed Reviews: Bad and Worse
advertisement
advertisement

Sears’ MyGofer Prototype Gets Mixed Reviews: Bad and Worse

Written by Evan Schuman
June 1st, 2009
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Sears opened in May its MyGofer trial store, a drive-through approach for picking up merchandise purchased online. But preliminary reviews have been unhappy, with TheStreet.com calling it “a bad cross between Amazon and Dairy Barn.” A prominent Chicago retail consultant questioned why consumers wouldn’t simply pick up their online products at an existing Sears store.

“That’s where it totally breaks down for me. Why would I change my behavior to go here?” asked Mara Devitt, a partner at Chicago-based McMillan Doolittle, who also complained about the quality of the site that is connected with the new venture. “It’s the most frustrating Web experience,” she said, citing as an example that it offered no product dimensions.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Sears’ MyGofer Prototype Gets Mixed Reviews: Bad and Worse

  1. Bill Hanna Says:

    Why is everyone so fast to kill this idea??? Has any of these reviewers actually been to the store or tried the service? I went through a tour of the facility a few days ago, and made a purchase and followed it through. What a great idea! Think about your household items or groceries. Your able to make a list online, at your convenience, and drive through using a very sophisticated system, and retrieve your order in minutes. How about if your running out to a party, and forgot to get snacks, or even a GIFT for someone. Order online, mark the item as a gift, and when you pick it up minutes later, its delivered to your car, in a gift bag with tissue, and a card to put your recipients name on. Now that’s service!

    It would be great for folks to actually see our use what they review before being so negative. It’s a fantastic idea. It would be great to see it make a decent go of it.

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...