Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Sony, NXP Pursue Universal Cellphone Contactless Payment Method
advertisement
advertisement

Sony, NXP Pursue Universal Cellphone Contactless Payment Method

Written by Evan Schuman
November 20th, 2006
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Is a standard cellphone format for contactless payment in the offing? Unlikely, but some major players are going to make a lot of noise trying. Sony and NXP Semiconductors (formerly Philips Semiconductors) on Monday announced that they will work together to–by mid-year 2007–”plan, develop, produce and market a secure chip that will include both Mifare and Felica operating systems and applications, as well as other contactless card operating systems and applications.”

That’s quite an undertaking. The pair officially got the backing of the GSM Association, a major telco organization representing 14 mobile network operators: Bouygues Telecom, China Mobile, Cingular Wireless, KPN, Mobilkom Austria, Orange, SFR, SK Telecom, Telefonica Móviles España, Telenor, TeliaSonera, TIM, Vodafone and 3. The Sony/NXP objective, according to a joint statement the companies issued, is to combine what they will create with an NFC chip to create a universal contactless IC platform for cellphones.

To be fair, these kinds of relationships are essential for truly interoperable mobile payments systems to be deployed. But the hurdles on doing something like globally are huge. Then again, so are the incentives.


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...