Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » A Little Bit Of IT Hustle Goes A Long Way These Days
advertisement
advertisement

A Little Bit Of IT Hustle Goes A Long Way These Days

Written by Todd L. Michaud
February 24th, 2010
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Franchisee Columnist Todd Michaud has spent the last 16 years trying to fight IT issues, with the last six years focused on franchisee IT issues. He is currently responsible for IT at Focus Brands (Cinnabon, Carvel, Schlotzsky’s and Moe’s Southwestern Grill).

Some salespeople are just plain lazy. I’m not sure how they manage to keep earning a paycheck. With all of the “plates in the air,” I consider my time my most valuable resource. As a result, I get really annoyed by people who waste my time, especially salespeople. If a salesperson doesn’t put in the effort to learn about potential customers before engaging with them, he is going to be given a “Bozo” tag, and that is a very difficult tag to remove.

Thirty minutes of research about a person or a company can have such a big impact on the sales process that it baffles me why so few providers take the time to do it. It seems to me that “hustle” has become the exception rather than the rule in sales.

I had a chance to attend the Food Service Technology Conference and Showcase this week in Long Beach, CA. During my time at FS/TEC, I was struck by examples of both great sales hustle and the opposite. I’ll start with what didn’t work.

One of sessions was called “Speed Dating.” This is the description from the E-mail I received to set up the session: “As a roundtable leader, you will bring one of your business challenges or opportunities to the table—literally—and engage in a dialogue with seven (7) pre-screened suppliers who may have ideas or resources that will help you move your business forward. It is not intended to be a sales call, but a high level consultation that facilitates understanding and problem solving.”

Each “session” was 10 minutes long, and the IT providers rotated among the tables. I decided to participate in this session largely because I was interested to see how it all worked. OK, so it didn’t hurt that the show also offered to offset some of my travel costs.

My overall impression of the event is that, while it was somewhat awkward (probably similar to real speed dating), I gained a lot of insight from the providers; they helped me understand the depth of their offerings. In most cases, I was not aware of some of the services and products on offer that could potentially address a current Focus Brands challenge. I am glad I had the chance to participate.

But what bothered me about the event is that some of the vendors had done no preparation for the session. It was finalized the week prior to the event, and a list of attendees was provided to all of the providers. As a result, I was somewhat surprised when I was asked, “So what does Focus Brands do?”

With a perfect opportunity to have a focused, one-on-one conversation with me about my challenges/issues, I would have thought the person sitting across the table from me would at least be aware of which brands we represent. But that was not the case. It’s too bad that this person wasted a good opportunity to have a valuable dialogue about our challenges (as I was able to have with some of the other providers in the session) because of a lack of knowledge about our business.


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...