Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Watching (And Counting) Your Peas and Queues To Pick The Fastest Supermarket Checkout
advertisement
advertisement

Watching (And Counting) Your Peas and Queues To Pick The Fastest Supermarket Checkout

Written by Fred J. Aun
October 6th, 2009
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

It is one of modern mankind’s most profound questions: Which checkout line at the supermarket is the best choice? Will choosing the Express Lane, with its four shoppers carrying a couple of items each, get you out of there faster than the regular lane with one shopper and her cartful of groceries? On his blog, California math teacher Dan Meyer said he’s been “obsessed” for years over finding a mathematical way to choose the fastest checkout line. “It’s my DaVinci code,” wrote Meyer. So he spent hours watching grocery store queues, reviewing POS data and making calculations.

Although he conceded there are “easily a dozen” variables involved, Meyer determined that adding one person to a queue adds a minimum of 48 seconds to the checkout speed, not even counting the number of items each person is buying. “Meanwhile, an extra item only costs you an extra 2.8 seconds,” Meyer wrote. “Therefore, you’d rather add 17 more items to the line than one extra person!” That means the Express Lane is often the wrong choice. However, as we all know, it takes just six words from a cashier to derail the best calculation: “I need a price check, please.”


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...