Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » What Does Subway’s Contactless Trial Mean For Payment?
advertisement
advertisement

What Does Subway’s Contactless Trial Mean For Payment?

Written by Evan Schuman
May 4th, 2009
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Subway, the 31,000-store sandwich restaurant chain, has agreed to be the latest guinea pig for Visa’s contactless payment program. Subway confirmed Thursday (April 30) that it will soon make the payment technology available to “participating” locations in Canada. Subway has about 2,400 stores in Canada, many of which are franchised.

Typically, statements announcing such deals (which, in this case, included Subway’s acquirer for its stores in Canada, Chase Paymentech) feature a canned quote from an executive with the chain, praising the vendor for its wisdom. In this case, the quote provided by Subway was anything but warm. The statement from Marina O’Rourke, the chain’s director of retail technology, decidedly said nothing good about contactless, beyond that the chain is willing to see whether it works. “We are looking forward to the opportunity to understand the impact of contactless on speed of service as well as understanding how many of our customers take advantage of this payment method,” O’Rourke’s statement said, in its entirety.

Contactless is an impressive technology, but O’Rourke is right to be cautious. The trials that have been less than enthusiastic for contactless have had little to do with the robustness of the technology. It’s simply the lack of interest among consumers.

For quite a few years, American consumers couldn’t have cared less about which manufacturer’s CPU was in their laptop or PC. They cared about the hardware brand (IBM, Dell, Apple, etc.) but consumers had few thoughts beyond that. A huge marketing campaign by Intel got consumers juiced and caused the unthinkable to happen. Consumers actually walked into computer stores seeking Pentium PCs, regardless of the computer brand.

If Intel could make a CPU that compelling, why couldn’t Visa do the same for contactless payment? Until someone does that, these trials have huge obstacles. What’s the benefit for consumers? It’s different behavior, which requires a compelling incentive. Are products cheaper if purchased by contactless? Are the warranties better?

The only half-hearted argument that’s been made is that it’s more convenient, but is it really? Does it really take that much more time to remove a credit card from a purse and wallet and swipe it as opposed to waiving it?

Subway, which has been out in front of technology trends more often than not, is a chain to be watched and to be taken very seriously. Still, one has to wonder, how seriously is Visa itself taking contactless payment?


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...