Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Visa Deal Pushes Heartland Breach Settlement Costs (So Far) To $65 Million
advertisement
advertisement

Visa Deal Pushes Heartland Breach Settlement Costs (So Far) To $65 Million

Written by Fred J. Aun
January 14th, 2010
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

A settlement with Visa announced Friday (Jan. 8) will require Heartland Payment Systems (HPS) to pay $59.22 million to compensate Visa card issuers for costs they incurred as a result of Heartland’s massive 2007 data breach. The Visa settlement follows two other recent agreements, one with American Express and another with a group of breach-affected cardholders, and it will bring Heartland’s breach-related settlement compensation tab to about $65 million.

But the bleeding won’t stop there. HPS has yet to reach agreements with Discover, MasterCard or others.

The Visa agreement, described in a filing with the Federal Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), calls for HPS to take out a $53 million loan to help it pay $59.22 million to Heartland Bank and KeyBank National Association, two of its sponsor banks. Visa will pay back to the banks $780,000 in fines it collected from them after the breach.

The massive intrusion, which touched 130 million cards, began in December 2007 and wasn’t discovered until January 2009. It was supposedly masterminded by Albert Gonzalez of Miami.

“The settlement amount represents a significant recovery to Visa issuers for losses they may have suffered from the Heartland data security breach,” said Visa and Heartland in a statement, stressing that not only will all U.S. card issuers be eligible to receive a portion of the recovery but international issuers of accounts that Visa “considered to have been placed at risk of compromise” will also be included.

Visa and Heartland pointed out the settlement agreement must be approved by at least 80 percent of the affected card issuers. In the statement, Visa’s chief enterprise risk officer, Ellen Richey, said Visa believes the issuers “will benefit by participating in this settlement program because it offers an immediate recovery with respect to losses they may have incurred.” Heartland CEO Bob Carr, in the same statement, said he believes the settlement with Visa is a fair one that “helps issuers obtain a recovery.”

The settlement between Heartland and American Express, announced in mid-December, calls for Heartland to pay Amex $3.6 million. It was described by Heartland as being “the first agreement with a card brand” relating to the data breach. Additionally, Heartland agreed to settle consumer cardholder class action lawsuits that were consolidated in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Under the terms of the settlement, Heartland will pay $1 million to $2.4 million “to class members who submit valid claims for losses as a result of the intrusion.”

The settlement is limited to people who had payment cards used in the U.S. between Dec. 6, 2007 and Dec. 31, 2008 “and who allege or may allege they suffered losses” due to the breach at Heartland. Heartland also agreed to pay all costs associated with the administration of the settlement, including up to $1.5 million for sending notices to class members and up to $760,000 of the attorneys’ fees and costs.

One tidbit, buried in a statement about the settlement, notes that Heartland will “submit the report of an independent expert” regarding its actions and plans “to enhance the security of its computer system” since the breach was disclosed. Heartland reserved the right to cancel the agreement if more than 2,500 people submit bona-fide requests to be excluded from the class members or if it will cost more than $1.5 million to send notices about the settlement.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Visa Deal Pushes Heartland Breach Settlement Costs (So Far) To $65 Million

  1. Janice Gaines Says:

    Anyone else here reading “I.T. WARS”? I had to read parts of this book as part of my employee orientation at a new job. The book talks about a whole new culture as being necessary – an eCulture – for a true understanding of security, being that most identity/data breaches are due to simple human errors. It has great chapters on security, as well as risk, content management, project management, acceptable use, policies, and so on. Just Google “IT WARS” – check out a couple links down and read the interview with the author David Scott. (Full title is “I.T. WARS: Managing the Business-Technology Weave in the New Millennium”).

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...