Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » A Gift Card Good For 100 Competing Retailers?
advertisement
advertisement

A Gift Card Good For 100 Competing Retailers?

Written by Evan Schuman
November 30th, 2009
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

A group of about 100 competing restaurants in Connecticut is trying an experiment: Each is putting out a joint gift card, one that would theoretically be much more attractive because it would give consumers far more choices. Could this idea possibly have value beyond food?

Restaurants are, by their nature, very different from most other retailers (to the extent that they are considered retailers at all). They tend to attract a strongly local customer base, so if another restaurant is just a few ZIP codes away, it’s not likely to be too competitive. That could make the downside of such a program—giving dollars away to rivals—less of a problem.

But the radical idea of such a joint gift card does address the fear of bankruptcy, which is what the Connecticut Attorney General stressed when his office announced the Connecticut card.

“A rash of restaurant and retail closings last season turned expensive gift cards into worthless plastic. Consumers rightly need reassurance that gift cards are as reliable as cash,” said Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal. “This gift certificate program should be a model beyond the holidays, for all retailers.”

In a sense, this program is sort of a cross between a traditional gift card and a Visa gift card. Even a gift card with 100 retailers participating—especially if many are smaller merchants—is a lot more restrictive than a credit card brand’s card.

Such a card also raises the issues of “Who carries the administrative burdens?” and “Who holds the cash until it’s used?” But in days of economic uncertainty, joint gift cards may not be such a ludicrous concept.


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...