Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Another Day, Another Bogus “Consumer” Review On Amazon
advertisement
advertisement

Another Day, Another Bogus “Consumer” Review On Amazon

Written by Fred J. Aun
February 4th, 2009
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Demonstrating again the downside of consumer product reviews on E-commerce sites, it was reported by The New York Times that some flowery comments on Amazon.com about the Carbonite online backup service were penned not by a happy customer but by an ethically-challenged Carbonite marketing guy. The revelation came shortly after news that a bold Belkin employee was actually paying people to write phony positive Amazon.com reviews about Belkin networking equipment.

Amazon says it has systems that aim to prevent this manipulation. We’re not suggesting that Amazon is at fault here and we should point out that the world’s largest E-tailer is going to attract the most fraud attempts. That said, there are ways that Amazon could make it more difficult to game their system, at the cost of making honest comments taking more time to post. There’s also the labor cost of verifying that the posts are legitimate.


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...