Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Best Buy Kicks Visa Contactless Out Of The Building
advertisement
advertisement

Best Buy Kicks Visa Contactless Out Of The Building

Written by Evan Schuman
January 6th, 2010
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Within a few months of Best Buy threatening Visa that it will halt accepting its contactless card unless Visa changed its fees, the $35 billion 1,023-store chain made good on its threats and became Visa contactless-less.

The controversy involves Visa forcing chains to accept more expensive signature—as opposed to the more retail-friendly PIN—authorization. Best Buy is still accepting Visa magstripe cards plus other brands’ contactless offerings.

The Visa contactless issue is, technically, not a different price for contactless per se. The problem involves a Visa prohibition against allowing a PIN to be used with a Visa contactless debit card and it’s the lack of a PIN option that pushes those transactions into a much higher interchange rate. Mastercard’s contactless cards have no such restriction.

Best Buy started accepting Visa contactless back in August 2007 and it was in all of their stores by April 2008, but by July 2009, it started pushing back against new Visa rules forcing higher signature rates and Best Buy issued a statement July 16 that it “is constantly looking at ways to reduce the cost of check lane tender. As part of this exercise, we are evaluating the continued acceptance of Visa-issued contactless payment cards in our stores in light of recent price increases. However, at this time we have not completed our analysis.”

“After several discussions with Visa produced no agreeable changes,” the chain started removing its acceptance of Visa contactless cards in October, completing the cutoff in November, said one Best Buy executive involved in the decision. The cutoff happened store by store along with POS upgrades.

“Our decision was based on the costs associated with requiring contactless debit transactions be processed as signature debit,” the Best Buy executive said.

Word has been slow in getting out, with many Best Buy store-based associates unaware of the change—with several insisting in early January that it was still accepted—and even Visa is still proclaiming on its contactless Web site–as of Tuesday (Jan. 5)—that Best Buy is accepting the cards.


advertisement

4 Comments | Read Best Buy Kicks Visa Contactless Out Of The Building

  1. sleze Says:

    Meh. None of my credit cards have pins. I always sign.

  2. Mobile Payments Says:

    With market trends these days, everyone is moving towards contactless payment processing. However, key thing here to note is the proliferation of cellular phones and smart phones.

    It won’t be long until we are all paying via our mobile payments account, and no longer carrying plastic. Just wave your phone in front of the reader, and it will be paid. Exciting things are in the works.

  3. Todd Ablowitz Says:

    This article is very interesting. Of course, it brings up more questions than answers. Is Best Buy starting a trend? Will this impact Visa’s approach? What is Best Buy losing by turning off PayWave cards? What is Visa losing by not having contactless acceptance at Best Buy?Most importantly, I wonder what the long term effect will be. Will this move the needle either way?

  4. Steve Sommers Says:

    Since these cards can be swiped, I think Visa has much more to lose in this battle than Best Buy.

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...