Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Breach Update: Forever 21 Stored 5-Year-Old Transaction Data
advertisement
advertisement

Breach Update: Forever 21 Stored 5-Year-Old Transaction Data

Written by Evan Schuman
September 25th, 2008
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

New information released by Forever 21 confirms that the almost 100,000 credit and debit cards accessed from the chain in a breach included transactions from 2003 through 2005, which were stored on a corporate data center, apparently in violation of PCI rules.

"The files were inadvertently retained within other data files and this was not uncovered by the assessor," said a Forever 21 statement issued to StorefrontBacktalk in response to written questions.

Unlike some of Forever 21’s fellow retail chain victims in the so-called TJX Breach case—including TJX, BJ’s Wholesale Club, OfficeMax, Boston Market, Barnes & Noble, Sports Authority and DSW—Forever 21 now says that wardriving (wireless interception) was not involved in its breach and that the data was accessed directly from the corporate data center.

"The numbers were not stolen at the point-of-sale. Stored data was illegally accessed from the corporate data center. The data was taken in January 2008, but the data was related to transactions occurring in years 2003 to 2005," the statement said.

The older data came from a single store in Fresno, Calif., raising the possibility that it was test data that had been used for a system trial and that it had been long forgotten.

Forever 21’s statement also said that neither the chain’s internal security mechanisms nor outside allies (credit card issuers, issuing banks, etc.) identified that the chain had been breached at all.

"The United States Secret Service contacted us in Spring of 2008 indicating that our name was among a list of retail stores which were thought to be potential targets. Neither the monthly vulnerability scan conducted by our outside audit company nor an internal investigation conducted as a result of the contact revealed signs of a breach," the statement said. It wasn’t until Aug. 11—some six days after the feds unsealed the federal charges naming Forever 21 and other retail chains as victims—that "the Secret Service was able to provide us with information that enabled us to confirm a breach."


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...