Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Does “M-Commerce” Really Mean “iPhone” To eBay?
advertisement
advertisement

Does “M-Commerce” Really Mean “iPhone” To eBay?

Written by Fred J. Aun
October 28th, 2009
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Efforts by eBay in the Mobile Commerce arena seem to illustrate a conundrum facing other retailers with M-Commerce yearnings: Should they focus their efforts (and money) on catering to the Apple iPhone or on mobile sites that can handle all mobile devices? Of course, many retailers are doing both. But recent comments from eBay CEO John Donahoe indicate that, when it comes to mobile, the iPhone is the apple of eBay’s corporate eye.

During eBay’s third-quarter earnings presentation, Donahoe said little about M.ebay.com, the company’s mobile Web site, choosing instead to focus on eBay’s app for the iPhone. Donahoe said the app has been downloaded more than 4 million times and is expected to generate more than $500 million in sales over eBay this year. “And consumers can more easily use PayPal for their purchases on the iPhone than ever before,” he noted. “We’re rapidly iterating in mobile and will soon be introducing the next version of our eBay iPhone app with improved functionality and features.” Looks like when it comes to M-Commerce buzz, there’s the iPhone and then there’s everything else.


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...