Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Fidelity Tells Customers It’s Shutting Down Self-Service Kiosks
advertisement
advertisement

Fidelity Tells Customers It’s Shutting Down Self-Service Kiosks

Written by Evan Schuman
February 25th, 2010
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Traditionally, when a retailer rolls out upgraded customer-facing hardware—be it an ATM, self-checkout machine or perhaps a price-checking kiosk—the chain says nothing until it has installed the new systems. Then it can discuss the benefits the new apparatus offers the customer. Fidelity Investments apparently chose to break with tradition.

This month, an electronic message started appearing on automatic deposit machines telling investors that the machines were being “decommissioned” early this year. Some store associates added that the timing would be more like May or early summer.

At first, this seemed an ordinarily unusual move, as few chains that have made the investment in self-service machines (Fidelity started rolling them out 10 years ago) bother to yank them out. But then Fidelity tried to explain the move, and what seemed merely unusual became positively surreal.

Fidelity, after being contacted, E-mailed a statement saying that “we are currently transitioning to new technology to better suit customer needs.” Fair enough, but what new technology? The company wouldn’t specify.

Fidelity spokesperson Teri Ginsburg said that the current kiosks will be removed the first half of this year and that—for an unspecified “period of time”—customers will have no automated assistance. She said that “new technology” and a “new approach” would be brought in that was “not a machine” and would be “not a direct replacement” for the self-service kiosks.

Asked why they didn’t wait for the new units, Ginsburg said the removal of the old units would make it easier to put in the new technology.

Either way, why announce to all customers—months before it’s slated to happen—that some hardware is being discontinued? What’s the point? It doesn’t help the consumer or the chain. We are waiting to hear more answers from Fidelity as to what the new approach is. Either way, this seems like a bizarre way to transition self-service approaches.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Fidelity Tells Customers It’s Shutting Down Self-Service Kiosks

  1. Todd Ablowitz Says:

    Interesting story. Evan- do you think this could be due to some sort of fraud that was happening? Did you probe on that area? When something seems to make no sense on the surface, one has to wonder what one does not know. I can easily believe there’s a new technology they want to implement, but I agree with the question you pose… why would they rip out the old one before the new one’s ready? Fishy.

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...