Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Ghirardelli Chocolate Sweetens Its M-Commerce Taste
advertisement
advertisement

Ghirardelli Chocolate Sweetens Its M-Commerce Taste

Written by Evan Schuman
October 1st, 2009
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Among the torrent of retailers and manufacturers jumping on the Mobile-Commerce bandwagon, almost all are focusing on adding capabilities to the M-Commerce direct Web experience. But Ghirardelli saved its creativity for a standalone mobile application. It’s iPhone app, for example, taps into the phone’s database—including the address book—to accelerate checkout.

But Ghirardelli is far from alone is being nervous about making the checkout process too easy. Customers must repeatedly type—or access—their content on the phone every time they shop, because the app points out that “Guest checkout does not save any information for future express checkout.” And yet, the app provides no capability for the consumer to create an account from the app. That needs to happen on the site, although the app doesn’t say that. The app also doesn’t seem to readily accept coupons.

The site—delivered from Digby—also seems to need a little work. It didn’t seem able to actually access that database data, forcing us—during a test of the site—to have to type in full E-mail address and name three times (that’s annoying, even on an iPhone). It also crashed four times during 30 minutes of testing.

That all said, Ghirardelli is not only heading down the right path, but it’s doing it in a non-traditional manner. Once it gets this mobile app to be completely and solely on the mobile device—and it works out the bugs—it’s going to be one very sweet confection.


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...