Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Good News For Fingerprint Fans …. Maybe
advertisement
advertisement

Good News For Fingerprint Fans …. Maybe

Written by Evan Schuman
November 15th, 2006
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Retailers experimenting with fingerprint identify verification have seen ample anecdotal and survey evidence suggesting consumer resistance to the idea. A new survey from Harris Interactive (funded by Diebold, a vendor with a strong interest in the results) announced Tuesday has a hint of good news for fingerprint fans, with 72 percent of 2,000 consumer respondents last month saying that fingerprint-scanning ATMs would give them “a positive or very positive feeling toward their bank.”

There are, however, reasons to be suspicious of such data. First, beyond the vendor-involvement in the research, the company’s statement said the 72 percent was for all biometrics. The wording of the question did indeed ask about biometrics, but the question only offered one example and that example was fingerprinting. If the consumer didn’t know what biometrics meant–and not that many do–they would likely answer it solely relating to fingerprints (as opposed to facial recognition, retina scan, voiceprint, etc.).

That all said, it’s an unusual survey that shows such a strong consumer preference for fingerprint scans. Might be a trend worth watching.


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...