Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Study: RFID Scan Accuracy Drops As Number Of Items Increases
advertisement
advertisement

Study: RFID Scan Accuracy Drops As Number Of Items Increases

Written by Eric Athas
August 7th, 2008
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

The more RFID-tagged items retailers place on Z-bars or shelves, or in boxes, the lower the read rate will be when those items are scanned, according to a study out of the University of Arkansas. By setting up store-like scenarios in a university lab, researchers conducted three feasibility test scenarios of RFID tagged apparel and shoes.

What they found was that when an associate scanned items, the number of items scanned affected the read rate. For example, researchers scanned RFID items hung on a rounder. When there were 97 items, they found a 99.38 percent read rate. Compare that to the 89.89 percent accuracy of 180 items scanned.


advertisement

2 Comments | Read Study: RFID Scan Accuracy Drops As Number Of Items Increases

  1. Chris Kapsambelis Says:

    One element of this application is the reading of tags on clothing hanging on a Z-bar. Using a mobile RFID reader, the user is asked to aim the reader at the clothes in various orientations passing it back and forth and around until all the readings were recorded.

    What bothered me about this procedure is the question as to when, and how the user determines that all the tags are read.

    On the last page of this study I found the following sentence:

    “In the course of evaluating read rates to determine how a test should proceed, each tester often had to know how many tags they were attempting to read during a test. In practice, however, this might often not be the case.”

    I believe the last sentence of this quotation to be incorrect. It is safe to say that in practice this is never the case.

    I believe the read rates would be much lower in any practical environment where the user does not know the number of tags involved, and has to use judgment to determine when to stop. Furthermore, the results would be highly variable from user to user depending on training and commitment to the task.

    The study can be downloaded from here:

    http://itri.uark.edu/91.asp?code=&article=ITRI-WP112-0608

  2. Roberto Says:

    In my experience with Item Level RFID tests, I have found that today’s RFID HandHelds do are not ready for doing cycle counts of item level tagged product. Also, RFID HandHelds are much more sensitive to the quality of the RFID tag.

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...