Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Yes, Virginia, There Really Can Be A Strategic Kiosk Strategy
advertisement
advertisement

Yes, Virginia, There Really Can Be A Strategic Kiosk Strategy

Written by Evan Schuman
October 9th, 2008
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

If you’re going to be in New York City on Wednesday (Oct. 15), you might want to drop by the StorefrontBacktalk panel on strategic kiosk use (yes, there is such a thing) at the Javits Center during the KioskCom/Self-Service Expo show.

We’re going to start things off by examining Home Depot’s kiosk approaches and concerns (one of our panelists has been working on it for months) and then debate the security risks of kiosks, the difficulties of POS (and back-office) integration and—for laughs—talk about some of the more futuristic robotic kiosks in the wings. It’s from 3:15 to 4:15 PM and we’d love to have you join us. Someone needs to ask probing questions. If you don’t, I’ll have to, and what fun would that be?


advertisement

One Comment | Read Yes, Virginia, There Really Can Be A Strategic Kiosk Strategy

  1. Rob Martell Says:

    Personally, I avoid kiosks.
    I don’t want to spend the time learning some software and hardware that I rarely use (different ones at every store) when a low wage human who uses the scanners and registers every day can quickly whisk me through. And it keeps them employed. Win-Win.

    I’ve been through the local Ikea, as well as HomeDepot and other places with these things, and the lines are usually just as long, as everyone stares at the contraption trying to figure it out. Really, until designers and engineers use real people (no repeat users) to design these things, it will not be a huge hit. Certainly a few check-out clerks would be cheaper than all that equipment, and having to have people there to assist anyway? Of course they can’t amortize the employees, and the customers will get used to being annoyed.

    FWIW,

    Rob

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...