Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Aging UPC Barcode Might Be Spared The January Noose On Coupons
advertisement
advertisement

Aging UPC Barcode Might Be Spared The January Noose On Coupons

Written by Fred J. Aun
June 8th, 2009
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

In another sign that doesn’t bode well for the long-planned January adoption of the next-generation barcode, the GS1 DataBar, a major coupon industry organization has reversed itself and now says traditional barcodes should remain on coupons way past New Year’s Eve.

Since September 2007, the Joint Industry Coupon Committee (JICC), the trade organizations pushing for the widespread adoption of the GS1 DataBar on coupons, has called for Jan. 1 to be the day coupons no longer contain the old UPC-A barcodes.

Currently, many coupons bear both types of codes as an interim measure since all retailers have not upgraded their barcode scanning and processing equipment to handle the more info-packed GS1 DataBar.

But in a June 3 “assessment summary” regarding the plan to stop including the UPC-A on coupons, the JICC said “preliminary data” about retailer readiness for the change show the January target is unrealistic.

The committee noted there are “gaps” in its knowledge about retailer preparedness largely because “several large national-scale retailers have not responded” to requests for information. Those requests came in the form of an online survey asking retailers to describe their ability to scan and process the GS1 DataBar by the Jan. 1 voluntary “sunrise” date.

JICC said it intends to “immediately secure means to obtain additional respondents to the survey to ensure a more accurate assessment” of the level of GS1 DataBar readiness. It did not specify how it plans to coax the retailers into playing along.


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...