Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Is E-Commerce Good For The Planet?
advertisement
advertisement

Is E-Commerce Good For The Planet?

Written by Evan Schuman
March 5th, 2009
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Here’s a different argument to make to the CEO next week: Increasing your E-Commerce investment will help save the world. (Or, to paraphrase a line from the original Ghostbusters film: If you approve this E-Commerce plan, you will have just saved the lives of 6.7 billion potential registered site visitors.)

OK, maybe it’s a reach, but not so much as one might think. A study published by Carnegie Mellon University Tuesday (March 3) found that “shopping online reduces environmental impact with 35 percent less energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions compared to the traditional retail shopping model.”

The report tracked a package of flash drives from Buy.com and compared it to a brick-and-mortar purchase, with an eye on energy use and carbon dioxide emissions. The biggest single factor that gave E-Commerce a huge boost was the assumption about the customer’s driving distance, followed by the consumer’s fuel economy, the cost of the e-tailer’s packaging versus the store’s electricity and the energy and emissions involved in the retail freight efforts and the energy needs of the data center and the warehouse.


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...