Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Is Wal-Mart Warming To Global IT Outsourcing?
advertisement
advertisement

Is Wal-Mart Warming To Global IT Outsourcing?

Written by Evan Schuman
February 22nd, 2009
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Wal-Mart has historically had a strong fondness for its own homegrown apps, given the $401 billion chain’s rather absurdly large size. The company has liberalized that policy recently, allowing a few shrink-wrapped enterprise apps to slip in. Now there’s a report in Economic Times that Bentonville is seriously considering an Indian business process outsourcing contract that could include “non-core processes of procurement, merchandising, finance, accounting and payroll” and be valued at as much as $500 million.

The story quoted from a Wal-Mart document that said “Wal-Mart will expand staffing of certain elements of IT application maintenance and development with some of India’s leading information technology firms. India is one of several countries that the company is targeting as part of its remote sourcing model for IT activities.” Vendors in the running, the story said, include IBM, TCS, WNS and Wipro.


advertisement

2 Comments | Read Is Wal-Mart Warming To Global IT Outsourcing?

  1. roo Says:

    great… unemployment is skyrocketing, and here’s another company preparing to offshore more jobs.

  2. David Says:

    So just who will be left to buy what Wallmart sells. Unless by moving there IT to India will allow them to just give their products away. Just one more company that proves that the bottom line is more important than people, our US economy as long as they can pay their dividens to the stock holders…….. the heck with everything else.

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...